Work

Multi-location Architecture Firm

Already the AI-visibility leader in a competitive, multi-location category — before any GEO-specific work began.

#1
AI visibility, ahead of 10 tracked competitors
58%
AI visibility share
+27%
visibility growth in the first 30 days
The challenge

Twelve months of SEO work, and no way to see it in AI answers.

A multi-location architecture firm had been a long-standing SEO client — technical foundations and content built up over twelve months, in a category crowded with regional and national competitors.

When the client asked to expand into AI visibility, there was no baseline. In a niche like architecture, AI answers lean heavily on a firm's own site and how competitors and industry sources reference each other — not manufactured backlinks — so nobody could say where they actually stood the moment AI-driven search started to matter.

Our approach

Measure first, before assuming a gap exists.

Rather than starting a separate GEO initiative from scratch, we flipped on AI-visibility tracking against the client's real competitive set — treating twelve months of technical SEO and content work as the hypothesis, and the data as the test.

Technical SEO foundation

Twelve months of technical fixes and structural improvements, addressed well before AI visibility was ever part of the conversation.

Content engineering

Built out service and location content designed around how prospective clients — and increasingly, the models they ask — actually search.

AI visibility measurement

Stood up competitive AI-visibility tracking to see, for the first time, where the firm actually ranked against its real competitive set.

The results

Already #1, and still climbing.

The first 30 days of tracking told a story twelve months of SEO work had already written.

AI visibility for the client rose from 35% to 58% over 30 days, reaching #1 ahead of every tracked competitor, most of which declined or stayed flat.
AI visibility tracking · 30-day viewAI visibility share for the client vs. anonymized competitors, first 30 days of tracking. — Internal AI-visibility tracking, 2026

From the first day of tracking, the client was already the clear leader in its category — 58% AI visibility and a 26% share of voice, both the highest of any tracked competitor. Over the following month, that lead widened further: visibility climbed another 27%, while most of the ten tracked competitors declined or stayed flat.

In this niche, AI answers are driven less by manufactured backlinks and more by a firm's own site and how competitors and industry sources reference each other — which meant twelve months of real SEO fundamentals were already doing the work of GEO, before GEO was ever a line item.

Anonymized AI-visibility leaderboard: the client ranked #1 at 58% visibility and 26% share of voice, ahead of nine anonymized competitors.
AI visibility leaderboard · anonymizedRanked by AI visibility share; competitor names anonymized. — Internal AI-visibility tracking, 2026
Key takeaways

What made the difference.

SEO fundamentals are GEO in citation-driven niches

Where AI answers lean on a site's own authority and industry cross-references, real SEO work already produces AI visibility — GEO didn't need a separate playbook here.

Measurement can reveal a win you already have

The client didn't need a new strategy to lead in AI answers — they needed the tracking that proved they already did.

A lead compounds fast

Once ahead, the gap between the client and its ten tracked competitors widened within the first month of measurement.

Let's write your next case study.

A direct conversation about where you stand today — and what it would take to lead.

Start a conversation