Work

Enterprise Healthcare Company

Became the cited source and leading recommended brand for high-intent clinical questions.

#1
cited source, core questions
+23%
LLM share of voice (SOV)
750k
AI-referred visits in 28 days
The challenge

Invisible on the questions that mattered most.

A national online addiction health provider had strong clinical content and steady to slightly-declining search traffic but was losing some ground to new entrants to the marketplace and had very low visibility in the AI tools patients now ask first.

On high-intent clinical questions, national and government organizations were being cited instead. Increasingly, the model’s answer was the first impression a patient formed, and this client wanted to be there.

In a highly regulated, high-trust category, being absent from the answer means lost traffic, lost authority and lost trust, resulting in a downstream impact of lost patient growth opportunities.

Our approach

Built to be understood, and trusted.

Five connected areas, integrated into one system instead of a checklist of tactics. In a regulated category, being cited is earned on accuracy and trust, and we needed to increase both.

Technical foundation

Audited and fixed technical issues that were impacting indexation and crawlability.

Content architecture

Organized clinical content around the questions patients actually ask, adding new content and updating existing.

Authority development

Strengthened the off-site signals a regulated category rewards with consistent brand messaging and highlighting published research.

AI visibility

Positioned the content to be retrieved and cited across the major answer engines.

The results

From absent to cited.

Share of AI answers citing the client rose from 4 percent in month one to 41 percent by month six.
Share of AI answers citing the client, on its core clinical questions.

Share of AI answers citing the client, on its core clinical questions.

A year in, the client has become the most consistently referenced brand in its category across AI search — cited in 23% of tracked responses, ahead of every competitor measured, and appearing early in the answer when it does.

The content isn't just visible — it's trusted. This site is now retrieved as a source more often than any health authority except NIH.gov, ranking ahead of SAMHSA, HHS, and the CDC.

That authority is showing up at scale, too: Search Console data shows 757K AI-driven impressions in a recent 28-day window, with visibility still climbing month over month.

The work also uncovered a structural shift in how patients are served answers: a single clinical question can generate well over 100 related background queries as AI systems break it into narrower searches. This means content now has to answer the reformulated question, not just the one the patient typed.

AI answer · representative example

Ask a model how to evaluate a symptom, and it now returns a short list of trusted clinical sources — with Enterprise Healthcare Company consistently among them.

An illustrative example. The client now appears as a cited source for high-intent clinical questions.
Key takeaways

What made the difference.

Structure over volume

This client had the majority of needed content. The win came from making existing expertise visible.

Authority is the moat

In a regulated category, trusted signals decided who got cited.

Measure the answer

Tracking share of AI answers turned a vague ambition into a managed one.

Let's write your next case study.

A direct conversation about where you stand today — and what it would take to lead.

Start a conversation